Janepedia is reader-supported. When you buy through links on my site, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
People seem to like this meme, and it’s nice because I enjoy making lists. đź™‚ Robin did a 6 Sticks post last week, and Tori did one today. This one’s topic isÂ reasons. You can learn more about this and find link back methods on the introductory post.
This may or may not come off as an angry rant. Actually, it’sÂ technically me trying to beÂ informative, because YOU are breaking the rules on aÂ lot of levels with some of the things you’re doing. This is to all of the giveaway hosts that are doing ANYTHING on the list below. If you’re caught breaking the rules, your account(s) could be suspended and/or deleted by said social networks. I mean, youÂ do read the terms, don’t you?!
Rule-breaking reasons are stated as such.
1. You host a giveaway without using a third-partyÂ approved widget (like Rafflecopter) and require people to Like/friend you on Facebook.
News flash: This IS against the rules! Not only is it an inconvenience to me considering IÂ don’t want to lose my Facebook account for doing something that you’re requiring even though it’s against the rules, but it counts as an entry for a giveaway that [apparently] is something I’m interested in entering. Even worse, if a requirement/entry is to Like/comment a post/picture/etc., then that’s evenÂ more against the terms. YouÂ did read Facebook’s Pages Terms before hosting this giveaway, right? They even have a special set of guidelines for promotions, too.
You’re breaking the rules, and you’re dragging down all participants with you. I used to email people about this until they told me, “Well, I never got in trouble for it before, so if I don’t get caught it’s fine. If I do, I’ll know it was you who ratted me out.” I was really, honestly just trying to be nice. I’m done being nice to ignorant people. If you don’t follow the rules, you get consequences. I’mÂ so not going to be in the mix of people not following the rules.
Furthermore, having your giveaway directly on Facebook and requiring people to Like, Share, then comment that post to be entered isÂ also breaking the rules. You have to use a third-party application.
P.S. Those pages that use Facebook’s Like system as a voting mechanism are also going against Facebook’s terms.
2. You use Rafflecopter, but you require me to follow 5+ people on GFC, Bloglovin’ or Hello Cotton.
I’m talking about you, who has these in a separate entry, and has 5+ people for me to follow. If it’s sponsored, this entry requirement/option is evenÂ more stupid considering the next set is all of their Twitter accounts, all of their Facebook accounts, all of their Pinterest accounts. I also hate it when people require me to subscribe via RSS but make me go through Feedburner first â€” using my EMAIL. For me, that is one of THE most INCONVENIENT methods of subscribingÂ unless I really love your blog.
However, you don’t care about me. You just care about the numbers. Nothing more, nothing less. And THAT, fellow blogger, is most likely the reason I despise you and want Blogger to disappear. You’re ruining my impression of Blogger for all of the Blogger bloggers thatÂ don’t abuse its features and image. But hey, that’s another blog post for another time.
P.S. 5 is enough. Otherwise, I feel like it’s merely spam.
3. You use Rafflecopter, and one of the entries requires me to go toÂ another page to follow a set of Facebook/Bloglovin’/Hello Cotton/GFC links for the sponsors.
Technically, thisÂ is against Facebook’s terms since you are no longer going through the third-party application. Aside from that, this is an annoying inconvenience.
4. Certain entries (i.e. Instagram) equal more entries.
Firstly, this is more for you to moderate, assuming youÂ do moderate them as people enter (see #6). Second, I don’t have an Instagram account because IÂ can’t get one because IÂ don’t have a product that allows me to have one. Also, why can’t entries all just be worth 1? Someone else is getting extra entries, I did the rest of the entries, and now I miss anywhere from 1-10 extra entries because you’ve included Instagram. THOSE ENTRIES could have helped me to win.
And you’re a witch for being inconsiderate and making me feel like the unpopular kid in school again.
5. “Click this if you’ve completed all of the entries above! Be honest!”
Fuck you. 100% of the time I CAN’T because I’M NOT making an account on that service JUST FOR YOU.
6. “DON’T LIE! Winning entries (or the winning entry) will be moderated at time of drawing!”
In other words, this is what you’re freaking telling me:
I will moderate winning entries only. If your entry is false, you won’t win and another person will be drawn.
Here is the problem with that:
If you have, say, 500 entries from people, whether each option was worth 1 entry or not, and only about 20 people joined, hypothetically that’s 25 entries each through all 20 people.
That means that each person has a 5% chance of winning.
Unfortunately, if youÂ do not moderate these entriesÂ as you go, then the chance of winningÂ decreases per person.
Say only 10 entries of 5 of those people are legitimate.
If you moderate entriesÂ as you go, you are being a FAIR giveaway host by giving your participants a fair chance of winning.
- 15*25 for the 15 people who actually did all 25 entries they sent inÂ = 375 entries
- 5*10 for the 5 people who only did 10 of the 25 entries they sent inÂ = 50 entries
- Rather than havingÂ 500 entries, you really only haveÂ 425 legitimate entries
- The difference isÂ 75 entries.
See the difference?Â Please moderate as you go, and then again as winners are chosen. Host a FAIR giveaway. Tweet this to share awareness on how to do this!
Math IS used in real life after school.